NHL rule changes

Recently, the National Hockey League has made quite a few rule changes in order to “better” the game. Some of these rules include; hybrid icing, no tucking of jerseys into the pants, and an extra two minute penalty for taking your helmet off in a fight. Everyone of these rules has caused scrutiny for the League, and overall they are awful rule changes that have done nothing but cause problems.

The leagues previous ‘touch icing’ rule may have been dangerous when two players are rushing into the corner full speed from the other end of the ice. This is an issue that had to be addressed eventually, however changing it to hybrid icing is absolutely ridiculous. There has already been numerous instances throughout the league where the rule has caused problems. An example of this is when Jonathan Bernier of the Toronto Maple Leafs left a puck that he believed was going to be called icing (no-touch) and ended up rebounding off the boards, back out front and in the net. Don Cherry raises the point about this occurring later in the season when games, and seconds are crucial. This rule change should have been more definitive and left less on the shoulders of the referees.

Making the players keep their jerseys un-tucked is completely unnecessary. I could understand if it helped the referee’s identify players easier, however the players have their names on the back of their jerseys. Also, sometimes this is something that can’t be controlled. So a player is engaged in the play, and his jersey accidentally tucks in during a scrum in the corner, this player is now going to be assessed a penalty? or he will have to pull his jersey out mid-play? This makes no sense. What player is going to be focusing on his jersey while he is out on the ice. This will especially be problematic if players are being assessed ‘delay of game’ penalties in major situations in games that are actually meaningful. The only real reason I could see this being implemented into the league, is because the NHL is planning on putting advertisement on the jerseys, and is ensuring jersey tucks won’t effect this in the future.

Making it a penalty for removing your own helmet before a fight is the most understandable of the rule changes. They are trying to ensure that an incident such as the on on Dec. 21 2009 in the Senior A hockey league, where a player struck his head off the ice during a fight and ended up dying after being in a coma for 2 weeks. The only problem is  that it has caused players throughout the league to both remove their helmets previous to the fight in order to offset the minor penalties they receive. This has become somewhat of a spectacle throughout the league and there have even been incidents where players have removed each others helmets before engaging in a fight.

Overall, the National Hockey League made poor rule change decisions this year. It is understandable to want to address issues in the game and to try and make the game better and safer, however they should be more careful when doing so.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/26822/rule-changes-for-2013-14-season

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to NHL rule changes

  1. sroche19 says:

    I agree with your statements about the jersey rule and the helmet rule for fighting however i would have to disagree with you on the hybrid icing. I think that the hybrid icing should have been in the league a couple years ago and that the NHL is late on introducing it. The previous rule like you mentioned was dangerous and the hybrid icing is an easy way to eliminate unnecessary injuries, You bring up a good point in the Bernier Example however its early in the hybrid icing era and linesman are still getting used to it. By the end of the season and moving forward i dont think it will be an issue and eventually we will look back and wonder why we ever had touch icing in the first place,.

  2. It has been a wild year in the NHL thus far, and we’re not even in November yet…
    I agree that there has to be some changes to the changes that were made, especially with the hybrid icing. I think it’s (pardon my language) absolute bullshit. However, I think there needs to be a change from the regular icing rules that were in place. There have been way too many serious injuries for that to keep happening, so I am very much in favour of the full change to the no touch icing.
    Either change it fully, or don’t change it at all.

  3. cgates14 says:

    Although the hybrid icing has been a mess in many ways so far this year, I think with more time it will get better. The linesmen and players still seem confused on the rule at certain points and appear to be unclear of what the call will be. As it becomes more of a routine call, much like the “zero-tolerance” on stick infractions, players and referees will get used to it and the amount of confusion will hopefully go down.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s